Drawing for CALL UP PUT DOWN

USPTO serial 79014899

CALL UP PUT DOWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3253862Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 19, 2007
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALL UP PUT DOWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor K. Sapphire, Esq.

Victor K. Sapphire, Esq. Law Office of Victor Sapphire7190 Sunset Blvd Suite 116LOS ANGELES, CA 90046UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, namely board games, playing cardsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 16, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 28, 2018XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2018XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Sep 26, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 26, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 9, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 17, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 24, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 4, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 1, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 3, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 3, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 15, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance