Drawing for LULOP.COM

USPTO serial 79014954

LULOP.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3159075Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 17, 2006
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LULOP.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RAYMOND VAN DYKE

RAYMOND VAN DYKE Van Dyke Law1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWWashington Square, P.O. Box 65302Washington, DC 20035

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic appliances, namely, electronic computers; computer software for online video publishing, media asset management and Internet newsgathering; software for management of a distribution network and marketing of television, cinematographic, audio and video programsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Advertising services, management of commercial business, commercial management and business administration services for telecommunications networks for the distribution, marketing and promotion of television, cinematographic, audio and video programs for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038Telecommunications services, namely, broadcast of television, cinematographic, audio and video programsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Services in the entertainment sector, namely, organization of cultural and cinematographic eventsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Computer programming services for others in the fields of management of a distribution network and marketing of television, cinematographic audio and video programsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 27, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 17, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 21, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2006CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Jul 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 30, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance