Drawing for SIMASV

USPTO serial 79014960

SIMASV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3130131Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SIMASV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine tools for the cutting and forming of materials, namely, metal sheets and metal profiles; brakes for machines, namely, press brakes; horizontal hydraulic bending presses; fixed and variable angle notchers; hydraulic shearing machines for metal profiles; bending machines; pipe benders; nibbling machines for metal sheets; punching machines; punch presses; pipe and bevelers; beveling machines for metal sheets and pipesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 6, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 3, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 3, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 18, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 18, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 16, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Feb 24, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Feb 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance