USPTO serial 79014984
VACUPLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3202311Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- SISUN, SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VACUPLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1806 St-Légier, CH
CH-1806 St-Légier, CH
CH-1806 St-Légier, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum machines for pressure molding, low-pressure molding, ingot molding, and sand molding for use with metal casting; vacuum machines for injection molding for use with plastics; valves for vacuum machines and parts therefor; lifting installations for the molding and automatic feeding of casting machines and of injection machines for plastics; casting machines and injection molding machines and parts therefore | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |