Drawing for EPOCKET

USPTO serial 79014995

EPOCKET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3130132Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPOCKET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janice Housey

Janice Housey Symbus Law Group, LLCPO Box 11085McLean, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Remote control units for medical hearing aidsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
010[ Medical hearing aids for the deaf ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 19, 2013INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2012INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 25, 2011ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 18, 2011NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 201115AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED—
Nov 18, 201171.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 9, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2011EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2011PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Oct 11, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 4, 201115AFREGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED—
Oct 4, 201171AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Oct 4, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance