USPTO serial 79015006
JUPITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUPITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter L. Costas
PETER L COSTAS PEPE & HAZARD LLP225 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103-1516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | OPERATING TABLES AND PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY OPERATING TABLE PEDESTALS AND TABLE TOPS SUPPORTED THEREON; OPERATING TABLE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY PELVIS SUPPORTS, BUTTOCK SUPPORTS, ARM SUPPORTS, LEG SUPPORTS, KNEE SUPPORTS, FOOT SUPPORTS, LATERAL SUPPORTS, HEAD SUPPORTS, SHOULDER SUPPORTS AND RECTAL POSITIONING DEVICES FOR MEDICAL USE; TRANSPORTERS AND LIFTS FOR TRANSPORTING PATIENTS AND TABLE TOPS TO, AND FROM, OPERATING TABLE COLUMNS AND FOR LIFTING PATIENTS ONTO AND FROM, OPERATING TABLES, AND FOR LIFTING TABLE TOPS ONTO AND FROM COLUMNS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 7, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |