Drawing for SILVER ELEPHANT BLEND TYPE FULL FLAVOR

USPTO serial 79015014

SILVER ELEPHANT BLEND TYPE FULL FLAVOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488761Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SILVER ELEPHANT BLEND TYPE FULL FLAVOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery

JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034CigarettesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2016INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Jan 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 4, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 2, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 22, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 27, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 27, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 25, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 16, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 31, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 19, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance