USPTO serial 79015057
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex R Sluzas
Alex R Sluzas Paul and Paul1717 Arch StreetSuite 3740PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in controlling equipment for image collection and processing; computer software for use in processing images; computer controlled image capture devices, namely, frame-grabbers; device drivers for data processing computer related hardware, namely, scanners, video cameras, motion detectors, audio devices, printers, monitors, and displays; computer software for use in operating and providing machine vision; digital image processing software; video cameras; data processing equipment, namely, computers, single board computers, CPU boards, frame grabber boards, video camera interface boards, PCI mezzanine cards; computerized motion-detection computer hardware and computer software for controlling access to secured areas; computerized security management computer hardware and computer software for controlling access to secured areas; computer hardware and computer software for use in recording and transmitting vision and sound in machine vision applications; computerized video surveillance hardware and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of data processing devices, in particular, for systems controlling access to secured areas, data processing devices and programmes for identifying symbols, characters and pictograms, as well as devices for recording transmitting and rendering of vision and sound and components of any of these devices and modules for use in microelectronics and microcomputers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ Telecommunications, namely, electronic transmission of data by computers ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software consultation and advice; technology consulting in the fields of computerized security applications, industrial automation, machine vision, and pattern recognition; computer programming for third parties | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |