Drawing for IGC THE MAKE MATTERS

USPTO serial 79015175

IGC THE MAKE MATTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3189610Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 26, 2006
Examiner
OLANDRIA, WARREN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IGC THE MAKE MATTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID B. KIRSCHSTEIN

DAVID B KIRSCHSTEIN KIRSCHSTEIN, OTTINGER, ISRAEL, ET AL425 Fifth Avenue, 5th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-6105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Diamonds, polished or rough; earrings, necklaces, bracelets, ringsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 24, 2021XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 24, 2021XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 26, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Aug 27, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 10, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Oct 10, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Oct 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 2, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 31, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 10, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 16, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 28, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 28, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 6, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance