Drawing for GRAINS DE FRUIT

USPTO serial 79015229

GRAINS DE FRUIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242591Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRAINS DE FRUIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff, Linda J. Nowlin, Justin R. Young, R. Peter Spies

LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies; jams; compotes; eggs, milk; edible oils and fats; fats used for food; butter; charcuterie; tinned meat and fish; cheeses; milk beverages with high milk contentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032Beers; mineral and carbonated waters; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely fruit puree; lemonades; fruit nectars; soft drinks; non-alcoholic aperitifsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 20, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 17, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 17, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance