USPTO serial 79015235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ÖZAK TEKSTIL KONFEKSIYON SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ÖZAK TEKSTIL KONFEKSIYON SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
ÖZAK TEKSTIL KONFEKSIYON SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ÖZAK TEKSTIL KONFEKSIYON SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
ÖZAK TEKSTIL KONFEKSIYON SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ÖZAK TEKSTIL KONFEKSIYON SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Egbert
JOHN S EGBERT & JEREMY CRAFT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pullovers, skirts, dresses, blouses, jeans, trousers, jackets, raincoats, anoraks, sportswear, namely, sport shirts, sport shorts, polo shirts, shirts, t-shirts, sweat shirts, beach wear namely, bermuda shorts, knitwear, namely pants, overalls, underclothes, bodies, brassieres, dressing gowns, nightgowns, bath robes, bathing suits, pajamas, gloves, ski suits, headgear, namely hats, berets, caps, footwear, namely, shoes, excluding orthopedic shoes, slippers, boots, beach shoes and parts thereof; shoe parts, namely heel pieces, heels, stockings; clothing belts, ties, foulards, neckties, shawls, scarves, mufflers, neck scarves, collars for dresses, muffs, wristbands, headbands, clothing for babies, namely babies' diapers of textile | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |