USPTO serial 79015247
HARVEST JOY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3211539Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2007
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARVEST JOY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preparations made wholly or principally of bean curd, namely, dried bean curd sticks and dried bean curd sheets; dried beans; processed soy beans; processed vegetables; dried vegetables; preserved vegetables; canned vegetables; processed nuts, including peanuts chestnuts and edible nuts; processed chick peas; processed peas; sausages; preserved fruits; canned fruits; dried fruits, processed anchovies; oysters, prawns, shellfish and shrimp, all not live; preserved fish; salted fish; dried fish; canned fish; dried potatoes; dried tangerines; processed edible seeds; dried mushrooms; prepared mushrooms; mollusca; pork; processed dates and prunes; dried preparations for making soup; canned soups; processed almonds; dried apricots; processed figs; jellies for food; sliced cuttlefish and dried cuttlefish for human consumption; processed edible sesame seeds | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Spices; cinnamon; spices in the form of powders, including tumeric powders for use as a condiment, saffron for use as a seasoning and curry powders; sauce powders; cloves; vermicelli noodles; noodles; rice; rice cakes; ground pepper; sugar; husked barley prepared for human consumption; prepared pearl barley; sago; star aniseed; prawn crackers; crackers; dried whole-wheat grains; honey; processed corn; candy for food; soy sauce; dried chili peppers for use as seasoning; processed garlic toppings for cooking; preserved garlic for use as seasoning; desserts of nut, fruit and/or jelly origin ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 22, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |