USPTO serial 79015251
CLEARLAB YOUR INNOVATIVE CONTACT LENS PARTNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3211540Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 20, 2007
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEARLAB YOUR INNOVATIVE CONTACT LENS PARTNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irene Y. Lee
IRENE Y. LEE RUSS AUGUST & KABAT12424 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, product inserts, patient fitting guides and product care guides in the field of eye care and health of the eye | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely promoting the sale of ophthalmic pharmaceuticals, contact lenses and ophthalmic surgical instruments and equipment of others through the distribution of printed material, contests and incentive reward programs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARLAB INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARLAB INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARLAB INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by CLEARLAB SG PTE LTD
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CLEARLAB YOUR INNOVATIVE CONTACT LENS PARTNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 23, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |