Drawing for CURTIS & PATRIDGE

USPTO serial 79015305

CURTIS & PATRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURTIS & PATRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Flavourings, other than essential oils; star aniseed; cookies; pancakes; buns; bread rolls; vermicelli; coffee flavourings; sweeteners; sausage binding materials; glucose for food; mustard; thickening agents for cooking foodstuff; artificial coffee; confectionery; cakes; pastries; farinaceous food pastes; pasty; frozen yoghurt; cocoa; cocoa products; capers; caramels; gruel, with a milk base, for food; sweetmeats; coffee; unroasted coffee; starch for food; crackers; groats for human food; corn (milled); corn (roasted); meat pies; turmeric for food; couscous; farinaceous foods; noodles; edible ices; candy for food; rice cakes; maltose; fruit jellies (confectionery); marzipan; custard; honey; royal jelly for human consumption (not for medical purposes); ice cream; flour for food; muesli; mint for confectionery; cocoa beverages with milk; coffee beverages with milk; coffee-based beverages; tea-based beverages; chocolate beverages with milk; chocolate-based beverages; cocoa-based beverages; infusions, not medicinal; crushed oats; husked oats; nutmegs, lozenges (confectionery); molasses for food; pepper; petits fours (cakes); ravioli; pies; pizzas; fondants (confectionery); popcorn; powders for ice creams; pralines; condiments; meat tenderizers, for household purposes; cereal preparations; flour-milling products; oat-based food; starch products for food; propolis for human consumption; gingerbread; spices; puddings; cake powder; ravioli; chewing gum, not for medical purposes; rice; spring rolls; sugar; aniseed; cake paste; confectionery; malt for human consumption; salt for preserving foodstuff; cooking salt; celery salt; spaghetti; seasonings; preparations for stiffening whipped cream; rusks; breadcrumbs; sushi; sandwiches; yeast in pill form, not for medical use; tabbouleh; tacos; tapioca; almond paste; tortillas; tarts; edible decorations for cakes; vinegar; ferments for pastes; halvah; bread; corn flakes; chicory; tea; chocolate; malt extract for food; essences for foodstuffs (except etheric essences and essential oils)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 26, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 12, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 22, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 10, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 25, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 30, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 27, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance