Drawing for ONE

USPTO serial 79015307

ONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3133318Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa W. Rosaya

Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP1114 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software and programs for mobile phones and communication devices; computer game software and programs enabling users to play games with mobile phones and communication devices; computer software and programs enabling users of mobile phones and communication devices to simultaneously access databases and global computer networks; computer software and programs enabling transfer of data between mobile communication apparatus; virtual reality game software; data cards containing computer game software; mobile phones and mobile phones with additional features such as short messaging, Internet access, MP3 player and radio; portable listening devices, namely, MP3 players and radiosSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
028Hand-held unit for playing electronic games; hand-held unit for playing video games; mobile-phone-controlled toy vehicles, dolls, kites, and model planesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Entertainment services, namely, providing computer games to mobile phones, communication devices, and computers via telecommunication and global computer networks; providing online computer games via networks among communications networks, computers, mobile phones, and communication devicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 26, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 28, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 28, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 29, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 25, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jan 6, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 25, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 5, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 5, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance