Drawing for SNBC

USPTO serial 79015320

SNBC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3378778Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2008
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SNBC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yue (Robert) Xu

Yue (Robert) Xu Apex Attorneys at Law, LLP160 Alamo Plaza #942Alamo, CA 94507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Automatic and electric stamping machines; paper mache producing machines; ] labelers, namely, electronic scale labeling machines for direct thermal printing of bar code labels for consumer products; [ rotary printing presses; ] typographic printing press machines [ ; offset printing press machines; boring machines; plate making machines for use in the printing industry and for use in printing press applications ]ACTIVE
009Bar code readers; data processing equipment, namely, scanners; computer peripherals, namely, printers; recorded computer software for use in the operating, management and image procession of printers and scanners; automatic and electric ticket dispensers, namely, apparatus which generates tickets; electronically encoded tags for goods; weighing machines, namely, scales and balances; optical character readers; [ semiconductor devices; ] optical sensors for detecting static imagesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 4, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 21, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jan 22, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 22, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 22, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 18, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 31, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 31, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 31, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jan 14, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Jan 14, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 14, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 16, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 11, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 11, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 9, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance