USPTO serial 79015325
HOLO WIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3572697Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2009
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOLO WIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
CN
Other trademarks owned by CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
CN
Other trademarks owned by CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
CN
Other trademarks owned by CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Toothbrushes; electric toothbrushes; toilet brushes; buckets made of woven fabrics; combs; nail brushes; brushes for footwear; pig bristles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Felts; towels of textile; Turkish towel; bed blankets; mattress covers; table mats not of paper; place mats not of paper; fabric fitted toilet lid covers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by CHINA METALLURGICAL IMP. & EXP. ANHUI COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named HOLO WIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |