Drawing for ROVEX

USPTO serial 79015337

ROVEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3409267Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 8, 2008
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROVEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer C. Debrow

ROVEX INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD297-305 South Gippsland HighwayDandenong South,AUSTRALIA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Fishing tackle, fishing reels, rods, lines, lures, hooks, gaffs, creels, floats, sinkers and hand-held nets for sport fishingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 18, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 3, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 2, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 9, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 9, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 4, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 16, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 16, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Apr 30, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 12, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance