Drawing for CERTAS

USPTO serial 79015375

CERTAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3112241Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 4, 2006
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CERTAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik N. Lund

Erik N. Lund Whitestone Law PLLC8000 Westpark Drive. Suite 250Mclean, VA 22102United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machines for manufacturing semi-conductors; machines for manufacturing flat panel displays; semi-conductor manufacturing equipment, namely, processing chambers; equipment for flat panel display manufacturing machines and apparatus, namely, processing chambersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Sep 10, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 22, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 5, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 13, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 19, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 6, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Apr 30, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Apr 30, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 8, 201671AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED
Mar 8, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 4, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 12, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jan 19, 2012NA15SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED
Jan 19, 201215AKREGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED
Jan 19, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jan 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 6, 2011ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2011E15RTEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED
May 14, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance