Drawing for DALLE FATTORIE DELLA VACCA ERCOLINA

USPTO serial 79015426

DALLE FATTORIE DELLA VACCA ERCOLINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3256555Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 26, 2007
Examiner
BROMAGHIM, PETER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DALLE FATTORIE DELLA VACCA ERCOLINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and processed fruits and vegetables, jams, compotes; dairy products, namely, butter, milk, eggs, cheese, yogurt; edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Rice, flours, preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack foods, honey, treacle, syrup, namely, table syrupSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Fresh fruits and vegetablesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032Beer; mineral and aerated waters; fruit beverages and fruit juices; syrups for beveragesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
033Alcoholic beverages in the nature of liqueurs, malt coolers, rum, wineSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
043Hotel and restaurant services, namely, providing of food and drink and temporary accommodationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Oct 9, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 8, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Apr 8, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 30, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 31, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 26, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 21, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 24, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 23, 2006UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
May 18, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 13, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance