USPTO serial 79015454
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PESCHIERA DEL GARDA (VERONA), IT
PESCHIERA DEL GARDA (VERONA), IT
PESCHIERA DEL GARDA (VERONA), IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick W. Meyers
Frederick W. Meyers Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan Ave.Suite 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Vegetable oils, fruit preserves, jams and tomato purée ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Coffee, rice, bread, noodles, vinegar, bakery products, biscuits, pastries and sauces ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, distilled spirits; red wines, white wines and sparkling wines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |