Drawing for IPRBOX

USPTO serial 79015462

IPRBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298162Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPRBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TANJA LILJESTRÖM

TANJA LILJESTRÖM ROSCHIER HOLMBERG ATTY LTDKESKUSKATU 7 AHELSINKI, 00100FINLAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for information and communication technology; computer software development tools; computer hardwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
035Business consultationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
036Financial investment in the field of information and communication technologySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Design and development of computer software and hardware; computer software consultation; consulting services and research in the field of information and communication technology; intellectual property consultation; patent agency and industrial property consultation; patent licensing; product development consultation; licensing of computer softwareSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 11, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 26, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 4, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 4, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 2, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 2, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 31, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 8, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 3, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 24, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2006UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 21, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance