Drawing for VERO ITALIANO

USPTO serial 79015469

VERO ITALIANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453887Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERO ITALIANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN S. EGBERT

JOHN S EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES412 MAIN ST 7TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jams, compotes; dairy products in the nature of milk, eggs, butter, cheese, yogurt, excluding ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Rice, flours, preparations made from cereals in the nature of cereal based snack food, ices in the nature of flavored ices, fruit ices; honeySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
031Fresh fruits and vegetablesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
032Fruit beverages and fruit juices, syrups and other preparations for making beverages in the nature of fruit juicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
043Providing of food and drink; providing temporary accommodationSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Oct 21, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Oct 9, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jan 30, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 29, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 28, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 28, 2008PBPRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - ESU SUPERVISOR REQUEST
Feb 28, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 28, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 28, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 30, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jun 30, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 26, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 2, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 16, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 27, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance