Drawing for JIN JING

USPTO serial 79015588

JIN JING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318406Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JIN JING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William R. Samuels

William R. Samuels Scarinci Hollenbeck3 Park AveFloor 15New York, NY 10016

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Carborundum, namely, industrial abrasives for use in grinding and blasting applications in the surface finishing and treatment industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 9, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 8, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 5, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Feb 5, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jan 25, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 25, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Oct 26, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 26, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 17, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 9, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 20, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Nov 20, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 20, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 24, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 28, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 28, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 10, 2007ISIRWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 27, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 25, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance