Drawing for DAYOU

USPTO serial 79015637

DAYOU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3196970Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with DAYOU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Prakash Nama

Prakash Nama Global IP Services, PLLC4621 Chestnut St,Bethesda, MD 20814United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Edible oil; crystallized fruits and dried fruits, namely, preserved prunes, preserved plums, preserved haws, preserved ginger and preserved orange; prepared nuts, namely, processed peanuts, processed melon seeds and processed pistachio nutsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 16, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 16, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jul 13, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 31, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 23, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 5, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Oct 5, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Oct 5, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 1, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jan 9, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 1, 2012NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Nov 1, 201271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 1, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 15, 2012ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 15, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 9, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance