USPTO serial 79015641
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOWARD N ARONSON
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Fortifying nutritional foodstuffs in the form of dietary and nutritional supplements, containing parapharmaceutical preparations, namely, micronized creatine monohydrates, creatine complex enriched with no precursors and taurine, amino acids, creatine esters, creatine precursors, creatine stacks, multivitamins and multiminerals for prophylactic purposes and intended for convalescence and for physically active persons and high performance athletes; * only as prescription-free over the counter products * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Nutritional concentrates and foodstuffs in the form of snack bars, pastes, edible oils and food additives, mainly containing vitamins, mineral salts, amino acids and enriched proteins, namely, whey protein hydrolysates, whey protein isolates, whey protein concentrates, egg proteins, protein-carbohydrate concentrates, intended for persons with increased protein demand, for quick development of muscular mass and strength, mainly for high-performance athletes and recreational exercisers and physically active persons | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Energizing nutritional concentrates and foodstuffs with a carbohydrate base and enriched with mineral salts, vitamins and proteins in the form of carbohydrate-based snack bars, farinaceous pastes for human consumption, enriched rice, nutritional oils for food purposes and food additives for non-nutritional purposes; tea; all intended for persons with increased protein demand, for quick development of muscular mass and strength, mainly for high-performance athletes and recreational exercisers and physically active persons | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic beverages in the form of energy drinks, isotonic drinks, sport drinks, enriched with vitamins, minerals, taurine, glucuronolactone, soluble fiber, high protein shakes, meal replacement shakes; preparations for preparing such beverages, all intended for physically active persons, athletes and bodybuilders | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2009 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |