CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BIOXET

USPTO serial 79015659

BIOXET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3162872Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2006
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOXET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond E. Farrell

Pina M. Campagna Carter, DeLuca, Farrell and Schmidt, LLP445 Broad Hollow RoadSuite 420Melville, NY 11747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances in the nature of laundry detergent for laundry use; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations in liquids and powders; soaps; perfumery, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 5, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 27, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 12, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 5, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance