Drawing for CANFLEX

USPTO serial 79015689

CANFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3233544Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2007
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CANFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

THILO C AGTHE WUERSCH & GERING LLP100 WALL ST 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Internal combustion engines for boats and for use with electric power generators; clutches and power transmissions for machines and for use with internal combustion engines for boats and for use with electric power generatorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Measuring and control devices, namely, electronic sensors for monitoring internal combustion engines and electric motors; computers and instruments for data processing, namely, performance and status monitoring computers and engine analyzers for diagnosing problems and faults in combustion engines, electric motors, hydraulic valves and power transmission unitsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Internal combustion engines for land vehicles; clutches for land vehicles; transmissions for land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 3, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 29, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 29, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 27, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 4, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 5, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 22, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 9, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 12, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance