Drawing for SITEFINITY

USPTO serial 79015694

SITEFINITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3130146Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SITEFINITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific and technological services, namely, information technological consulting; scientific research and design for others relating to the field of computers; industrial analysis of computer programs; research services in the field of computer programs; design and development of computer [ hardware and ] software for others [ ; legal services ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 6, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 30, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 19, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 15, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 25, 2016LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 7, 2016LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 7, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2015COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Aug 27, 2015PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Aug 27, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 20, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 15, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 21, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 14, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 14, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 14, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 14, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 14, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 23, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 10, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance