Drawing for WE CONVEY QUALITY

USPTO serial 79015727

WE CONVEY QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE CONVEY QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical apparatus and machines for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, mixing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; machines and mechanical apparatus for emptying bunkers, silos and large room stores, chain conveyors and conveyors for hot material; machines and mechanical apparatus for loosening bulk material stored in bunkers; belt conveyor systems, particularly consisting of steel plate conveyors and conveyors of different construction, belt conveyors; vertical and pendulum bucket conveyors incorporating supporting constructions in the form of belt bridges and delivery towersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Dosage apparatus and machines for bulk materialSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Cars for emptying bunkers; systems for tipping wagons comprised of front tippers, rotary tippers and side tippersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Technical planning, development, projecting and designing of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, withdrawing, wiping off, dosing, homogenizing bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; technical analysis services and technical survey in the field of apparatus, machines and facilities for transporting, storing, distributing, mixing, dosing, homogenizing, bunkering and apportioning of bulk material; technical project managementSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 14, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 24, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance