USPTO serial 79015738
CHÊNE DES DOMAINES DE FRANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHÊNE DES DOMAINES DE FRANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A. CORNMAN
MICHAEL A CORNMAN SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Semi-worked wood for making household utensils; building timber; sawn timber; manufactured timber, namely worked lumber; semi-worked timber; moldable semi-worked wood; wood paneling; wood veneer | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Wood shavings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Forestry products, namely unsawn timber, undressed timber | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |