Drawing for MAX POWER MARINE FUEL CELL

USPTO serial 79015780

MAX POWER MARINE FUEL CELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3211547Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 20, 2007
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX POWER MARINE FUEL CELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell

MARY MARGARET L O'DONNELL RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Devices for generating electricity, namely, electric power generators for leisure boatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Devices for recharging electricity storage devices, namely, fuel cells for use with leisure boatsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 30, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 22, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 5, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 6, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 31, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance