USPTO serial 79015786
HARTCHROM XL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3382038Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARTCHROM XL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-9323 STEINACH, CH
CH-9323 STEINACH, CH
CH-9323 STEINACH, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie B. Seyler
JULIE B SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys, namely iron ores, steel, aluminum, chromium, and chrome ores; coated surfaces of metal and chromium steel for cylinders, rollers, doctor blades, engines, piston heads, piston rings, piston shirts, cylinder liners, crankshafts, and valves, and gun barrels in the field of paper and print, general industries, marine propulsion, defense technology as well as in the automotive, aeronautics and nanochrome field | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials in the nature of metal, chromium steel, and nanochrome, namely hard chrome plating, structural chrome plating, nanochrome plating, thermal spray coating, nickel plating, zinc chromating, chromium/PTFE coating, nickel silicon carbide dispersion coating, cadmium plating, white zinc coating, anodizing, and burnishing; providing services for coating and processing of steel, cast iron, copper, brass, bronze, aluminum chrome, synthetic materials and magnesium; grinding, polishing and tempering of metal, galvanization, chromium plating and magnetization of metal; custom die trimming of material for others; chromium plating, namely providing hard chromium surfaces for others | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |