Drawing for CARMEL AGREXCO

USPTO serial 79015792

CARMEL AGREXCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3202334Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 2007
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARMEL AGREXCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurel V. Dineff, Linda J. Nowlin, Justin R. Young, R. Peter Spies

LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 N WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural products and grains, namely, unprocessed grains for eating, agricultural grains for planting, cut flowers, live flowers, flower seeds, flower bulbs, flower cuttings, living plants, plant propagation material, namely, bulbs, buds, cuttings, foliage plants, tissue cultures for plants, bare rooted plants; seeds for agricultural purposes, plant seeds, seeds and bulbs, seeds for fruits and vegetables, herb seeds; fresh fruits and fresh vegetables, fresh and raw herbsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 17, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 29, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jun 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance