Drawing for SYNCING. NET

USPTO serial 79015800

SYNCING. NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SYNCING. NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SUSAN NEAL

SUSAN NEIL NEAL & MCDEVITT, LLC1776 ASH STREETNORTHFIELD, IL 60093UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, computer programs that allow the sharing, transmission and management of digital information on personal computers, wireless mobile devices and other media through the Internet; computer hardware; CD-ROMS, floppy disks, and other data carriers with software, namely, prerecorded CD-ROMS, floppy disks, and magnetic data carriers featuring digital transmission softwareSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Development, creation, design and updating of software for others; consultancy services in connection with design and updating of software; maintenance and installation of software for othersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 12, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 16, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 16, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 27, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 10, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 12, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance