USPTO serial 79015946
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Yarns for textile use made in whole or substantial part of cotton | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Bed covers, calico, cheese cloth, chenille fabric, cotton fabrics, covers for cushions, embroidery, fabrics for textile use, face towels of textile, handkerchiefs of textile, household linen, knitted fabric, pillowcases, ramie fabric, rayon fabric, silk fabrics for printing patterns, table linen, table napkins of textile, towels of textile, and velvet, all of the foregoing made in whole or substantial part of cotton | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Garment articles, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, blouses, Bermuda shorts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and hats, sports garment articles, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, Bermuda shorts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, and hats, all of the foregoing made in whole or substantial part of cotton | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 16, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 12, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |