Drawing for WHISTLE

USPTO serial 79015975

WHISTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194471Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
JORDAN, AMEETA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHISTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay K. Meadway, Esq.

JAY K MEADWAY ESQ BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Bicycles and structural parts therefor; bicycle components, namely brakes, handle bars, frames, pedals, hubs, saddles, seat posts, stems, wheels, forks and shock absorbers; bicycle accessories, namely bicycle bells, bicycle bags and baskets, bicycle pumps, seat covers, bicycle mirrorsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Educational and entertainment services, namely conducting and organizing educational meetings, symposium and conferences in the field of vehicles; conducting and organizing cultural, sporting and recreational activities in the field of vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jan 31, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 31, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Oct 31, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 31, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 11, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 24, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 2, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 2, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 2, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 17, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 18, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 3, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 19, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 28, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Oct 27, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance