USPTO serial 79016010
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Peter Spies
R. Peter Spies Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 North Wacker DrieChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRIC, GAS AND WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, SMALL HARDWARE, NAMELY, COMPRESSION COUPLINGS MADE OF METAL FOR USE WITH ELECTRIC, GAS AND WATER HOSES, METAL PRESSURE SCREWS, METAL CABLE AND TUBE CLAMPS, METAL WALL DOWELS AND FASTENERS, NAMELY METAL BARS, CABLE HOLDERS AS METAL INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRIC, GAS AND WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY METAL CABLE CLIPS, METAL CABLE CONDUITS, METAL CABLE CONDUIT BRANCHES, METAL CLAMPS, METAL HOOPS, METAL WIRE CLAMPS FOR SCREWING AND PLUGGING AND METAL WIRE CLAMPS WITHOUT SCREWING | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRIC INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, CABLE HOLDERS, NAMELY, PLASTIC CONDUITS, PLASTIC CONDUIT BRANCHES] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | [INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRIC, GAS AND WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS, namely, BARS MADE OF PLASTIC FOR WIRE FASTENING] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | [NON-METALLIC INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRIC, GAS AND WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS, namely, SMALL HARDWARE, namely, FINAL SLEEVES, namely, PLASTIC END PIECES FOR CABLE CONDUITS AND PLASTIC HOSES, PLASTIC BLIND PLUGS, namely, PLASTIC END PIECES FOR SCREW CONNECTIONS, PLASTIC HOSES, PLASTIC CABLE CONDUITS AND PLASTIC CONDUIT BRANCHES, NON-METAL FASTENERS, NAMELY, BIFURCATED RIVETS AND COUNTER NUTS FOR SCREW CONNECTIONS OF SYNTHETIC MATERIALS, CABLE AND TUBE CLAMPS, CABLE HOLDERS, namely, FASTENER CLAMPS OF SYNTHETIC MATERIALS, WALL DOWELS OF RUBBER AND SYNTHETIC MATERIALS AS INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT FOR ELECTRIC, GAS AND WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS, PLASTIC WIRE CLAMPS FOR SCREWING AND PLUGGING AND PLASTIC WIRE CLAMPS WITHOUT SCREWING] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 24, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |