USPTO serial 79016016
KAMPMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3253866Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAMPMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE P. COLTON
LAURENCE P. COLTON SMITH TEMPEL BLAHA LLCTWO RAVINIA DRIVE, SUITE 700ATLANTA, GA 30346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Linear metal gratings, metal gratings for coiling [, water overflow metal gratings ] | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Radiators; duct heating systems composed primarily of tubes, pipes, ducts and pre-assembled manifolds through which water circulates; church heating systems composed primarily of tubes, pipes, ducts and pre-assembled manifolds through which water circulates; air treatment apparatus for heating, ventilation and cooling purposes, namely, air purifiers, air heaters, air filtering installations for domestic and commercial use; air coolers, namely, evaporative air coolers, condensor air coolers, air coolers operating with heat exchangers, and electric space cooling apparatus; warm air curtains electric space heaters, namely, apparatus for generating a curtain-like air barrier in front of room openings such as doors; [ hot air generators; ] heat exchangers; roof ventilators; underfloor heating systems composed of radiators, ducts, tubes, pipes and fans | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |