USPTO serial 79016052
VEINOPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159115Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- LAPTER, ALAIN J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VEINOPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FR
CN
FR
Central, Hong Kong, CN
US
FR
FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tama L. Drenski
Tama L. Drenski RENNER, KENNER, GREIVE, BOBAK, TAYLOR & WEBER106 S. Main Street, Suite 400First National TowerAkron, OH 44308-1412Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Body gels, namely, face gel, leg gel, anti-wrinkle gel, gel to relieve swelling in the legs, slimming gel, bath gel, shower gel, hair gel, sculpting gel; essential oils; anti-wrinkle products, namely, lotions, gels and creams; cosmetics; soaps, namely, soap for body care, liquid soap, hand soap, cream soap; creams, namely, anti-wrinkle cream, leg cream, slimming cream, body cream, face cream, lip cream, hair cream ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, oils to relieve heaviness in the legs in order to prevent deep venous thrombosis ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus, namely, electro-stimulators for the purpose of relieving heaviness in the legs; apparatus for recovery for athletes, namely, electro-stimulator devices, blood pressure monitors; massage apparatus; medical apparatus, namely, electro-stimulators for the purpose of anti-wrinkle, slimming, to relieve swelling in the legs, to prevent deep venous thrombosis, for venous blood return; [ orthopedic belts and footwear ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AD REM TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by VEINOPLUS HONG KONG LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AD REM TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by VEINOPLUS HONG KONG LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by DynaPulse Medical L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by AD REM TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks owned by AD REM TECHNOLOGY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named VEINOPLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 18, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 2, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |