USPTO serial 79016056
ONEUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONEUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARLENE J. WILLIAMS
BREVALEX F-75008 PARIS3, RUE DU DOCTEUR LANCEREAUX,FRANCEGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use by pharmaceutical laboratories and healthcare professionals for the management of an interactive database featuring data in the areas of health, the pharmaceutical industry, and for the management of customer relations information. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, servicing, maintenance, repair of computers and computer networks in the health and the pharmaceutical industries; offering technical assistance in connection with computers and computer networks in the health and the pharmaceutical industries. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Computer communication, namely, communication by computer terminals in the health and the pharmaceutical industries; electronic transmission of information taken from data banks in the health and the pharmaceutical industries; electronic transmission of data and information in the areas of health and the pharmaceutical industry; electronic transmission of data and information on a database in the areas of health and the pharmaceutical industry. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming in the health and the pharmaceutical industries; design, updating and rental of computer software in the health and the pharmaceutical industries; installation, servicing, maintenance and repair of computer software in the health and the pharmaceutical industries; and technical assistance relating to computer software, namely, troubleshooting computer software problems for others in the health and the pharmaceutical industries. | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |