USPTO serial 79016121
F&M
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with F&M?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. W. Gipple
J W GIPPLE GIPPLE & HALE6665-A OLD DOMINION DRMCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Hampers | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; caviar; pate; partridge; grouse; pheasant; chicken; curried liver; curried mutton; curried chicken; fish pastes; hams; tongues; bacon; meat in tins, glasses and terrines, potted meats; beefs extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; fruits in tins and bottles; processed cherries; processed pineapple; fruit salads; processed apricots; processed pears; processed peaches; processed grapefruit; prunes; processed plums; dried figs; processed marrons; jellies; jams; marmalade; mincemeat; soups; fruit sauces, namely, apple sauces; dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; eggs; milk; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats;fruit preserves, vegetable preserves; pickles; flavored butter; brandy butter; pickled onions; cranberry sauce; soup and preparations for making soup; hampers, namely, gift baskets containing one or more of the aforementioned foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; black tea; black tea in bags; green tea; green tea in bags; cocoa; artificial coffee; coffee essences and coffee extracts, mixture of coffee and chicory; chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; scented tea and flavored tea; sugar; rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flour, and preparations made from cereals; namely, breakfast cereals, processed cereals and cereal based snack foods; bread; spiced bread; biscuits; cakes; pastry and confectionery, namely, chocolates, liqueur chocolates and candy; flavored ices; honey; treacle; yeast, baking powder; mustard; pepper, vinegar; sauces; spices; ice; condiments, namely, salt, pepper, processed herbs, spices, pickled ginger, curry powder, non-medicated confectionery,namely, non-medicated candy; sugar substitute candy, sugar confectionery, namely, sugar candy, Turkish delight and pate of fruits; petit fours; salt for food relish sauces excluding cranberry sauce and apple sauce; chutney; puddings; poppadums; pancakes; salad sauces; salad dressings; hampers, namely, gift baskets containing one or more of the aforementioned foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Hampers, namely, gift baskets containing fresh, unprocessed fruits, vegetables and nuts | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Hampers, namely, gift baskets containing soft drinks, fruit juices and mineral water | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Hampers, namely, gift baskets containing wine, champagne, spirits and liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | The bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods in a department store, a high street store featuring food and alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages, or a high street concession featuring food and alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages, a concession featuring food and alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages, located in a shopping center, or in an airport retail outlet the bringing together, for the benefit of others of food and alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from a general merchandise catalogueby mail order, from a general merchandise Internet site or by means of telecommunications; advice and assistance in the selection of goods of others; provision of information to customers relating to the goods of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Delivery services, namely, delivery of goods by air, road, rail and water, delivery of goods via truck; delivery of goods by mail; distribution of goods, namely, transportation of others' goods by truck; storage of goods, transportation of household goods via air and truck; packaging of goods for transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FORTNUM & MASON PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named F&M
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 23, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | RINX | USPTO CORRECTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |