Drawing for BEST EVER QUANTUM FINISH POWERBALL

USPTO serial 79016126

BEST EVER QUANTUM FINISH POWERBALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3206391Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2007
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEST EVER QUANTUM FINISH POWERBALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Heilman

ROBERT A HYDE RECKITT BENCKISER INC399 INTERPACE PKWYPARSIPPANY, NJ 07054UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and detergents for dishwashing; dishwasher cleanser, freshener and deodorizer; polishing preparations for kitchen and glassware; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations for dishwashing; decalcifying and descaling preparations for domestic use; all aforementioned goods with or without a disinfective componentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 2, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 1, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 12, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 12, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 12, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance