Drawing for PIUMA

USPTO serial 79016155

PIUMA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3245067Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2007
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIUMA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007pneumatic transporters, elevating apparatus, namely, hoists and cranes used in connecting with filmmakingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Optical apparatus and instruments, namely, cinematographic machines and apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
012Dollies for broadcastsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Apr 3, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 3, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 12, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 27, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 27, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 29, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 5, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 5, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
May 22, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 29, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 20, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 29, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 7, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance