Drawing for FUJI SEAL GROUP

USPTO serial 79016156

FUJI SEAL GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3280058Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 14, 2007
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUJI SEAL GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele P. Schwartz

NOBORU FUJIMOTO CHUO-KUOSAKA-SHI15-14, MINAMISEMBA 1-CHOME,OSAKA, 542 0081

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Labeling machines; shrink labeling machines; stretch sleeve labeling machines; packing machines; cartoning machines; packaging machines; wrapping machines; paper cutting machines; printing machines; plastic processing machines, namely injection molding machines, plastic extrusion machines, sheet forming machines, vacuum molding machines, pressure molding machines and blow molding machines; glassware manufacturing machines; adhesive tape dispensing machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
016Industrial packaging containers of paper; printed matter, namely, paper labels; plastic labels; shipping labels not of textileSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Non-metal cap closures; plastic packaging containers for consumer products of all types; lightweight plastic packaging containers; clear plastic sheet containers for consumer products of all types; plastic valves being other than machine parts; plastic stoppers for use with bottles, pouches and containers of all types; plastic lids and caps; drinking strawsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2015INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Apr 23, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 21, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 21, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 26, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 22, 2010ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 24, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 9, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 6, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 1, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 23, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 22, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Nov 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Nov 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance