Drawing for NUTRISTEPS

USPTO serial 79016209

NUTRISTEPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NUTRISTEPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS. MEASUREMENT EVALUATIONS IN THE FIELD OF UNDERNUTRITION, PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF UNDERNUTRITION, PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS; TECHNOLOGY CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF UNDERNUTRITION, PROVIDED BY ENGINEERS; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF UNDERNITRUTIONSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Feb 27, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 26, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 27, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 21, 2007CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Dec 21, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Jun 12, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 3, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
May 24, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 4, 2007CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 3, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 6, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2006ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Nov 16, 2006LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 4, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance