USPTO serial 79016253
RHINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEETE, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RHINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Milena S. Mishev
MILENA S MISHEV GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN PC36 W 44TH ST STE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Ramps for skateboards | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |