Drawing for MONTE-PINADILLO

USPTO serial 79016291

MONTE-PINADILLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3209342Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 13, 2007
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with MONTE-PINADILLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne and Schwab666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
May 15, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jun 7, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 7, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Jun 7, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 13, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 3, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 23, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 18, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED
Mar 18, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Mar 18, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 12, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 30, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Sep 5, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 4, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 4, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 6, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 5, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 25, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance