Drawing for GUASCOR FOTON

USPTO serial 79016300

GUASCOR FOTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUASCOR FOTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jan Tamulewicz

JAN TAMULEWICZ KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP575 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2585UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Photovoltaic cells and photovoltaic panels and electronic and electric apparatus and instruments for conducting, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling of photovoltaic systems and of the energy generated by the sameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 13, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 13, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 2, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 27, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 17, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 15, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 8, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 19, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance