USPTO serial 79016319
DURUM MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3401961Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURUM MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH RYDE NSW 2113, AU
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Australia Capital Territory 2612, AU
Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Australia Capital Territory 2612, AU
Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Australia Capital Territory 2612, AU
Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamins and mineral supplements and vitamin-mineral supplement compositions, all being pharmaceutical preparations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Flour preparations made from processed cereals, namely, pasta, breakfast cereal, bread, biscuit, cake and pastry; ingredients in this class used in food, namely, processed grains, namely, milled grain, rolled grain, kibbled grain, cracked grain and ground grain | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, unprocessed grains; seeds, namely, seeds for agricultural and horticultural purposes; animal feed, namely, seeds for animal consumption; unprocessed seeds for human consumption; unprocessed grains, namely, genetically modified grains | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ascentia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Other trademarks owned by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named DURUM MAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |